Article Title
Abstract
This case note provides the factual background of Vance v. Ball State and briefly summarizes the legal precedent behind the decision. It analyzes the opinion of the Court, suggesting that the decision severely limited the essential protections against workplace harassment provided by Title VII, consequently making it more difficult for employees to prove employer vicarious liability for workplace harassment.
Recommended Citation
Lakisha A. Davis,
Who's the Boss? A Distinction Without a Difference,
19
Barry L. Rev.
(2013).
Available at:
https://lawpublications.barry.edu/barrylrev/vol19/iss1/5
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons